Jedi Knight 2 is an extremely unique incarnation of the Quake III engine and it also happens to make a terrific CPU benchmark as the game is rarely ever GPU bound with today's video cards.

3D Gaming Performance
Jedi Knight 2 - High Quality - 1024x768x32
Intel Pentium 4 2.53GHz

Intel Pentium 4B 2.4GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz

AMD Athlon XP 2100+ (1.73GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.2GHz

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ (1.67GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0A GHz

AMD Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.8GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.6GHz

116.6

113.4

109.7

104.3

104.3

101.7

97.3

96.3

92.5

88.6

83.0

77.2

|
0
|
23
|
47
|
70
|
93
|
117
|
140

The performance standings under Jedi Knight 2 are pretty similar to what we saw under UPT2002, however now the gaps between the individual CPUs widens considerably. For example, the fastest Pentium 4 (2.53GHz) ends up being 11.7% faster than the fastest Athlon XP (2100+) mostly because the benchmark isn't as GPU limited as UPT2002.

Finally we have Comanche 4, another fairly new game (DX8 compliant) with a very heavy CPU dependency as we've seen in recent video card roundups.

3D Gaming Performance
Comanche 4 - High Quality - 1024x768x32
Intel Pentium 4 2.53GHz

Intel Pentium 4B 2.4GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.4GHz

Intel Pentium 4 2.2GHz

AMD Athlon XP 2100+ (1.73GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0A GHz

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ (1.67GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53GHz)

AMD Athlon XP 1600+ (1.40GHz)

Intel Pentium 4 2.0GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.8GHz

Intel Pentium 4 1.6GHz

51.2

49.8

48.9

46.0

42.4

42.2

41.3

38.9

36.4

34.9

32.9

29.7

|
0
|
10
|
20
|
31
|
41
|
51
|
61

Under Comanche 4 we see that the larger L2 cache offered by the Northwood core is strongly favored, giving the Pentium 4 a solid lead here. If you look at the older Willamette CPUs, even the Athlon XP 1600+ can trounce the fastest 2GHz 0.18-micron part.

3D Gaming Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

3 Comments

View All Comments

  • Thatguy97 - Tuesday, April 28, 2015 - link

    people should comment more on these old articles there really interesting
  • Thatguy97 - Tuesday, April 28, 2015 - link

    They're
  • Dr AB - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link

    Yes I agree ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now